West Virginia Supreme Court Case To Decide on Gas and Oil Royalties

Started April 27, 2017 at 04:19 pm by @Perrylkeaton in Marcellus Shale

Send Message    View Discussions    Views: 1277
Dislike 0
04/27/17 04:19:51PM

Deductions could come via Supreme Court ruling

WHEELING — Those receiving royalty checks for Marcellus and Utica shale drilling in West Virginia could see their payments drop, pending a decision by the state’s Supreme Court of Appeals.

During a Wednesday meeting with mineral owners in Wheeling, West Virginia Royalty Owners Association Vice President Tom Huber shared a copy of a royalty statement from an operation in Pennsylvania that allowed the company to deduct “post-production expenses” from the mineral owner’s payment. In this particular instance, the expenses — $3,298.37 — were higher than the amount of royalties — $2,672.08 — due to the mineral owner, so the landowner actually owed money to the company.

The case Chief Justice Allen H. Loughry, along with Justices Robin Jean Davis, Margaret L. Workman, Menis E. Ketchum and Beth Walker, are scheduled to hear Tuesday could have a major impact on the finances of mineral owners who have leases with drilling companies.

“Any of you who have examples of post-production expenses know how it can eat up your royalties,” Tom Susman, organizer of the West Virginians for Property Rights group, said. “We’re pretty nervous about this.”

Because Marcellus and Utica shale natural gas often contains other substances — such as ethane, propane, butane and condensate — the gas stream must go through processing before it can go directly to market. These steps are considered post-production expenses.

According to Susman — and verified by court documents — the court voted 3-2 in November against allowing companies to take post-production expenses from royalty payments.

However, former Justice Brent Benjamin was one of those who voted in the majority, along with Davis and Workman.

Read more:http://www.theintelligencer.net/news/top-headlines/2017/04/west-virginia-supreme-court-case-to%E2%80%88decide-on-gas-and-oil-royalties/

04/27/17 04:35:41PM @pete:

I have been told you can watch this live @10am on Tuesday the 2nd of may on
the supreme courts website.

04/27/17 04:47:13PM @pete:

I guess when they are that greedy that 87.5% is not enough and they want mineral owners to pay them for producing the gas . how many times does a ruling have
to be made to stand or can you just keep appealing until it goes your way.
The legislature just needs to make it clear what it meant by ,at the well head , as being the point where gas or other substances are sold.

Edifying the Needful
05/01/17 12:08:27PM @edifying-the-needful:

Post production expenses wouldn't  be a problem IF the profits generated by the "finished" products was likewise shared with landowners.  That IS the real issue here...




    Example: Meriweather 35 H 001

Forecasting royalties, income and production for your wells.
Learn more »»

Tag Cloud
Upcoming Events
Dealmaker's Group