I'm not an attorney, so someone else may have a much better idea of what's going on here and the legal implications. But here's my two cents. If I am wrong hopefully someone will correct me.
Not sure I've ever heard of this situation. My understanding is that, notwithstanding anything in the lease that may allow for this situation to occur (no idea what that could possibly be), they would have to stop producing. Basically, in this case they are producing your oil and gas without legal rights to do so. This is also assuming that you own the oil and gas rights that you leased, and your lease was not released/forfeited because they discovered you did not own the oil and gas. I'm not sure what your best course of action is, but I would think you'd be able to stop them from producing the well, and also sue them for 100% of the value of any oil and gas recovered from your property while your property was not under lease.
well it is beginning to look like i will be the new working interest+ royalty owner for 100% of my minerals.
a-they were notified by registered mail
b- they chose not to respond within the 30 day period
c- register certified letter in court house to give public notice
d- sue them for stealing
I presume you are the only mineral rights holder in the well. If the well includes multiple persons, not sure you want to take on all the responsibilities of becoming a driller and the obligations to meet the leases of the other mineral rights holders, if that is even proper
You need a lawyer. If the lease is forfeit and the operator is still producing, they are trespassing. Stealing too, I guess, if they keep the working interest. Our leases are written that if a payment default persists for 30 days after they receive registered mail notice of the default, then the lease is forfeited. Your lease may have provisions that you can require the well to be plugged. Good luck and keep us posted.
you are correct lisa, their 30 days have almost expired, so they will have to come to me with an agreement to keep operating the well then, i assume this will be the outcome, how ever if they wish to plug it they have to offer it to me for one dollar which i don`t think they would want to lose four wells....lol
this will get interesting i do believe, since their current case involves 1900 flat rate royalty, the leases we signed we after deregulation and if they wanted deducts they should have been listed---funny how 2 companies before them read them as no deduction leases
I have a payment default on a flat rate lease too, not just this EQT taking deductions on a no deductions lease. Flat rate lease has paid less than $15 per year since 1894. More than 30 years recently without production, but started producing again in 2012 before I was the decision-maker. Haven't been paid in 3 years. My lawyer is sending a demand letter today that gives them 10 days to sign a release. It's over 18 months since I sent payment default notices.
§36-4-9a. Cancellation of oil or gas leases for nonpayment of delay rental; prohibition against maintaining actions or proceedings in state courts for enforcement of certain oil or gas leases; rebuttable presumption of intention to abandon well and well equipment.
Yup. It's in the letter. Operator also took out a plugging permit in 2011 and miraculously found product down the hole when they got there to pull the pipes, so resumed production after at least 30 years (that's all I can see on DEP) of no production.
do you think they could force pool you after they have forfieted
an existing lease ??? hard to tell what might be tried here, i guess
it depends on the value they place on a well/lease
There is not currently forced pooling, so I don't expect that. Perhaps they will sue to partition but my attorney thinks they would more likely try to negotiate a new lease with me. I hope that they will simply sign the release. My attorney says the only way they can retain this flat rate lease is if they can prove that every single payment owed to us has been paid. Since we haven't been paid in the last 3 years, they can't and likely they don't have records all the way back to 1894 to prove it either. I have another company that wants to lease the tract, who is doing due diligence now. I hope that they will lease it without issue, but decided to see if the current operator will sign the release so there is no question about the new company being able to lease.
The closet situation I can think of in this case would be the CHK Buel well where CHK had drilled a well upon the Buel property where the lease they had drilled upon had already expired.
I am no expert, but We had a similar experience and were told, the government can take what ever money they do not claim. Not sure if this is right, It sounds like what the government would do .
You would need to be very good at disappearing if you think you'd get away with walking away and having the state take your forfeited $5000 bond and plug the well. It can cost 3-4x the bond amount to properly plug one and if you have any assets, you'll be losing enough of them to pay for the plugging.